They should measure girth instead of length. How about density or mass. Or volume.
6
comments:
snowy gurl
said...
A hoot ! Interesting fieldwork to put on one's CV. Canada has it over the US/Alaska I see. And the grey shades - stratospheric? Gotta get me to Kazakstan... Seriously, length is such a misnomer and irrelevant in the satisfaction stakes methinks. hmm I think I might draw a boundary line around that one and stop now !
Notice how the super powers over the last couple of centuries have a smaller penis on average. The UK is a bit mediocre, the US is below average and the rapidly up and coming China... I guess over compensating does not stop at driving large cars.
6 comments:
A hoot ! Interesting fieldwork to put on one's CV. Canada has it over the US/Alaska I see. And the grey shades - stratospheric? Gotta get me to Kazakstan... Seriously, length is such a misnomer and irrelevant in the satisfaction stakes methinks. hmm I think I might draw a boundary line around that one and stop now !
totally
They must be measuring from the base of the balls.
16.10 - 17.83 ?! Please tell me that's centimeters.
Notice how the super powers over the last couple of centuries have a smaller penis on average. The UK is a bit mediocre, the US is below average and the rapidly up and coming China... I guess over compensating does not stop at driving large cars.
Someones' been watching South Park! :P
Post a Comment